Daily-timeframe technical comparison, refreshed hourly. Educational analytics, not financial advice.
| Metric | BTW | NEAR |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.44 | $4.67 |
| 24h change | -1.1% | -5.1% |
| 7d change | +66.7% | -3.0% |
| 30d change | +217.3% | +138.8% |
| 90d change | +1,803.5% | +131.4% |
| Volatility (90d, annualized) | 228.5% | 102.2% |
| Max drawdown (90d) | -23.8% | -23.2% |
| Market cap | $3.9B | $6.1B |
| 24h volume | $18.1M | $718M |
| RSI (1d) | 67 | 62 |
| ADX (1d) | 64 | 64 |
| Technical trend | Strong uptrend | Uptrend |
| Regime | Range | Trend ↑ |
| Composite score | +21/100 · 4/7 | +35/100 · 4/7 |
Bitway and NEAR Protocol were only loosely linked over the last 90 days: the correlation of their daily returns was just -0.09, so their prices largely went their own way.
Bitway swung far harder than NEAR Protocol: its annualized volatility of 228.5% was roughly 2.2 times NEAR Protocol's 102.2%. Their worst declines from a peak within the period were comparable: 23.8% for Bitway and 23.2% for NEAR Protocol.
Both gained over the last 90 days, but Bitway did better, returning +1,803.5% against +131.4% for NEAR Protocol. Bitway also led over the last 30 days (+217.3% versus +138.8%). The Bitway/NEAR Protocol price ratio rose 722.5% over 90 days (+32.9% over the last 30), meaning Bitway gained ground against NEAR Protocol.
Based on daily closing prices over the last 90 days. Describes past price behaviour only — not a forecast or financial advice.
Only weakly. The correlation of their daily returns over the last 90 days was -0.09 (on a −1 to +1 scale), so one coin's moves said little about the other's.
Yes. Over the last 90 days Bitway's annualized volatility was 228.5%, compared with 102.2% for NEAR Protocol.
Bitway: it returned +1,803.5% over the last 90 days, versus +131.4% for NEAR Protocol. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Bitway: its largest peak-to-trough decline was 23.8%, compared with 23.2% for NEAR Protocol.