Daily-timeframe technical comparison, refreshed hourly. Educational analytics, not financial advice.
| Metric | BTW | LEO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.44 | $8.98 |
| 24h change | -1.1% | +0.4% |
| 7d change | +66.7% | +0.6% |
| 30d change | +217.3% | -4.0% |
| 90d change | +1,803.5% | -3.2% |
| Volatility (90d, annualized) | 228.5% | 25.9% |
| Max drawdown (90d) | -23.8% | -10.2% |
| Market cap | $3.9B | $8.3B |
| 24h volume | $18.1M | $202.1K |
| RSI (1d) | 67 | 45 |
| ADX (1d) | 64 | 24 |
| Technical trend | Strong uptrend | Downtrend |
| Regime | Range | Range |
| Composite score | +21/100 · 4/7 | -10/100 · 4/7 |
Bitway and LEO Token were only loosely linked over the last 90 days: the correlation of their daily returns was just -0.05, so their prices largely went their own way.
Bitway swung far harder than LEO Token: its annualized volatility of 228.5% was roughly 8.8 times LEO Token's 25.9%. Bitway suffered the deeper pullback, falling as much as 23.8% from a peak, while LEO Token's worst decline was 10.2%.
Over the last 90 days Bitway rose 1,803.5% while LEO Token fell 3.2%. Bitway also led over the last 30 days (+217.3% versus -4.0%). The Bitway/LEO Token price ratio rose 1,866.6% over 90 days (+230.6% over the last 30), meaning Bitway gained ground against LEO Token.
Based on daily closing prices over the last 90 days. Describes past price behaviour only — not a forecast or financial advice.
Only weakly. The correlation of their daily returns over the last 90 days was -0.05 (on a −1 to +1 scale), so one coin's moves said little about the other's.
Yes. Over the last 90 days Bitway's annualized volatility was 228.5%, compared with 25.9% for LEO Token.
Bitway: it returned +1,803.5% over the last 90 days, versus -3.2% for LEO Token. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Bitway: its largest peak-to-trough decline was 23.8%, compared with 10.2% for LEO Token.