Daily-timeframe technical comparison, refreshed hourly. Educational analytics, not financial advice.
| Metric | BTW | HYPE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.44 | $88.01 |
| 24h change | -1.1% | -2.4% |
| 7d change | +66.8% | -4.1% |
| 30d change | +217.3% | +0.6% |
| 90d change | +1,803.1% | +23.3% |
| Volatility (90d, annualized) | 228.5% | 72.6% |
| Max drawdown (90d) | -23.8% | -26.9% |
| Market cap | $3.9B | $19.6B |
| 24h volume | $18.1M | $853.7M |
| RSI (1d) | 67 | 52 |
| ADX (1d) | 64 | 34 |
| Technical trend | Strong uptrend | Neutral |
| Regime | Range | Range |
| Composite score | +21/100 · 4/7 | -9/100 · 4/7 |
Unusually, Bitway and Hyperliquid tended to move in opposite directions over the last 90 days — the correlation of their daily returns was -0.20.
Bitway swung far harder than Hyperliquid: its annualized volatility of 228.5% was roughly 3.1 times Hyperliquid's 72.6%. Hyperliquid suffered the deeper pullback, falling as much as 26.9% from a peak, while Bitway's worst decline was 23.8%.
Both gained over the last 90 days, but Bitway did better, returning +1,803.1% against +23.3% for Hyperliquid. Bitway also led over the last 30 days (+217.3% versus +0.6%). The Bitway/Hyperliquid price ratio rose 1,443.6% over 90 days (+215.4% over the last 30), meaning Bitway gained ground against Hyperliquid.
Based on daily closing prices over the last 90 days. Describes past price behaviour only — not a forecast or financial advice.
They were inversely correlated: over the last 90 days the correlation of their daily returns was -0.20, so one tended to rise when the other fell.
Yes. Over the last 90 days Bitway's annualized volatility was 228.5%, compared with 72.6% for Hyperliquid.
Bitway: it returned +1,803.1% over the last 90 days, versus +23.3% for Hyperliquid. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Hyperliquid: its largest peak-to-trough decline was 26.9%, compared with 23.8% for Bitway.