Daily-timeframe technical comparison, refreshed hourly. Educational analytics, not financial advice.
| Metric | BTW | LINK |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.44 | $13.95 |
| 24h change | -1.1% | -3.1% |
| 7d change | +66.8% | -0.3% |
| 30d change | +217.2% | +17.8% |
| 90d change | +1,802.7% | +72.9% |
| Volatility (90d, annualized) | 228.5% | 67.6% |
| Max drawdown (90d) | -23.8% | -17.7% |
| Market cap | $3.9B | $10.4B |
| 24h volume | $18.1M | $512M |
| RSI (1d) | 67 | 58 |
| ADX (1d) | 64 | 39 |
| Technical trend | Strong uptrend | Uptrend |
| Regime | Range | Range |
| Composite score | +21/100 · 4/7 | +17/100 · 4/7 |
Unusually, Bitway and Chainlink tended to move in opposite directions over the last 90 days — the correlation of their daily returns was -0.27.
Bitway swung far harder than Chainlink: its annualized volatility of 228.5% was roughly 3.4 times Chainlink's 67.6%. Bitway suffered the deeper pullback, falling as much as 23.8% from a peak, while Chainlink's worst decline was 17.7%.
Both gained over the last 90 days, but Bitway did better, returning +1,802.7% against +72.9% for Chainlink. Bitway also led over the last 30 days (+217.2% versus +17.8%). The Bitway/Chainlink price ratio rose 1,000.6% over 90 days (+169.3% over the last 30), meaning Bitway gained ground against Chainlink.
Based on daily closing prices over the last 90 days. Describes past price behaviour only — not a forecast or financial advice.
They were inversely correlated: over the last 90 days the correlation of their daily returns was -0.27, so one tended to rise when the other fell.
Yes. Over the last 90 days Bitway's annualized volatility was 228.5%, compared with 67.6% for Chainlink.
Bitway: it returned +1,802.7% over the last 90 days, versus +72.9% for Chainlink. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Bitway: its largest peak-to-trough decline was 23.8%, compared with 17.7% for Chainlink.