Daily-timeframe technical comparison, refreshed hourly. Educational analytics, not financial advice.
| Metric | TAO | BTW |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $290.10 | $1.44 |
| 24h change | -7.1% | -1.1% |
| 7d change | -7.3% | +66.8% |
| 30d change | +28.5% | +217.3% |
| 90d change | +34.8% | +1,803.1% |
| Volatility (90d, annualized) | 80.0% | 228.5% |
| Max drawdown (90d) | -18.0% | -23.8% |
| Market cap | $3.3B | $3.9B |
| 24h volume | $273.3M | $18.1M |
| RSI (1d) | 55 | 67 |
| ADX (1d) | 33 | 64 |
| Technical trend | Neutral | Strong uptrend |
| Regime | Range | Range |
| Composite score | +14/100 · 4/7 | +21/100 · 4/7 |
Bittensor and Bitway were only loosely linked over the last 90 days: the correlation of their daily returns was just -0.09, so their prices largely went their own way.
Bitway swung far harder than Bittensor: its annualized volatility of 228.5% was roughly 2.9 times Bittensor's 80.0%. Bitway suffered the deeper pullback, falling as much as 23.8% from a peak, while Bittensor's worst decline was 18.0%.
Both gained over the last 90 days, but Bitway did better, returning +1,803.1% against +34.8% for Bittensor. Bitway also led over the last 30 days (+217.3% versus +28.5%). The Bittensor/Bitway price ratio fell 92.9% over 90 days (-59.5% over the last 30), meaning Bitway gained ground against Bittensor.
Based on daily closing prices over the last 90 days. Describes past price behaviour only — not a forecast or financial advice.
Only weakly. The correlation of their daily returns over the last 90 days was -0.09 (on a −1 to +1 scale), so one coin's moves said little about the other's.
No. Over the last 90 days Bittensor's annualized volatility was 80.0%, lower than Bitway's 228.5%.
Bitway: it returned +1,803.1% over the last 90 days, versus +34.8% for Bittensor. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Bitway: its largest peak-to-trough decline was 23.8%, compared with 18.0% for Bittensor.